Global Fund Says Zimbabwe Misused Grant, return requests Of MoneyThe Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria has said that Zimbabwe $ 7,000 last year misused $ 12,000 grant and the Global Fund officials have asked Zimbabwe to return the money, the New York Times reports (Dugger, New York Times, Zimbabwe Financial Officers have said that they need the money to Thursday back to Jon Liden, Global Fund Communications Director (AP / Google. According to John Parsons, the Global Fund inspector general, officials said in Zimbabwe they have not the means, because of the lack of foreign currency repaid..
Was used, he said, used used for their intended purpose. The Reserve Bank failure to due account the money only 495 Zimbabweans from the planned 27,000 to received safe distribution of medicines training, country of drugs to prevent malaria through the Global Fund reaches people in need provided, according to Parsons. In addition, the drug will expire by the middle of next year, and it would be ‘criminal’if the Global Fund is not able to distribute the drugs because of budgetary concerns, said Parsons.. After Parsons, the Global Fund in the past year $ 12,000 deposited in a foreign currency in Zimbabwe reserve Bank Although speculate Parsons like like the $ 7,000 of the grant.No, With the MTA disaster, the government has to be fairly incompetently in dealing and sensitive data is protected is. Forget ID cards, that national NHS database represents an even greater risk our personal data enabled into the public domain and abusing .
I am was by the loss of by the loss of two child benefit CDs. As no surprise, I have no confidence some form of the IT security that this administration beats. .. Medical history have no confidence in the NHS database, says BMA News Poll, UKNo, to ask By the government the last sneaky handling with regard to the universal medical care agreements and the contracts of the employees and employee Specialists in, we may, if it had the information the information that might in patients the best interests of prev government security guarantees are not worth the paper they are wrote for were have been .